This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Economy of India article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Add the year that data pertains to in FY format (2005–06 rather than 2005)
Sections that have a main article, are a summary of more detailed articles. If you find any points missing for such sections, please add it in the section's main article rather than on this page to keep this page size within reasonable limits or discuss it here before adding.
This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
Economy of India is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trade, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Trade on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TradeWikipedia:WikiProject TradeTemplate:WikiProject TradeTrade
This article needs to be updated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. (September 2022)
[[Global Hunger Index#Ranking|ranked 102nd]] The anchor (Ranking) has been deleted.
The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links.
Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
FX reserves are no longer $700 billion, as of march 14 2025 they are estimated at $654 billion.
Forex reserves need updating! the number given at $700 billion is woefully out of date. The reserves are updated regularly by the RBI yet no action has been taken by the editors of this page since I suspect they’re averse to undertaking such a exercise since it’s clear (by not bothering to update for over 4 months!) they’re happy to keep the pretence that the fx reserves are buoyant and by extension projecting a rosy image of the Indian economy, when in actuality they have declined by nearly $50 billion.
To not provide the most up to date information, even if it doesn’t suit the narrow biases of those who control this page, is to do a great disservice not only to this page but to the reading public, who rely on this platform for factual, non bias and up to date information. Not expecting any action to be taken since it’s clear that the editors are bias in presenting statistics that ‘look nice’ even though they’re factually outdated and thereby mislead the viewing public.
Done: Wikipedia editor here, We are not here to present biased information. We are here to present accurate information to the people. We always try to update information as soon as possible but surely we are liable to mistakes. Thanks, Warriorglance(talk to me) 06:19, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Done: Wikipedia editor here, We are not here to present biased information. We are here to present accurate information to the people. We always try to update information as soon as possible but surely we are liable to mistakes. Thanks, Warriorglance(talk to me) 06:19, 26 March 2025 (UTC)